| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
1. [PRESS RELEASE] Privateer Alliance FOLDS !! - in Corporation, Alliance and Organization Discussions [original thread]
I endorse this product and/or service. Had great fun fighting them way back when in SMASH. I'd like to add that Privs are an invluable service to the lowsec community. Always keeping to make those market-griefing bears leave "safe" empire. Artifi...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.05.21 16:48:00
|
2. Deimos (Kinda off topic) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Xonja 2zero on 30/03/2009 19:14:07 Originally by: Zealot [Zealot, HPulse] Medium 'Accommodation' Vestment Reconstructer I Internal Force Field Array I Armor Thermic Hardener II Energized Adaptive Nano Membrane II Overdrive ...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.30 19:11:00
|
3. Deimos (Kinda off topic) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: fuxinos But exactly that is the point of the Cerb and Zealot, to do that. They suffer from being fragil too and have, compared to the Deimos, pretty standard Dps, therefor they gain range. Oh, really? Since you seem to di...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.30 19:10:00
|
4. Deimos (Kinda off topic) - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Xonja 2zero on 30/03/2009 02:42:14 Originally by: fuxinos It already has ridiciules firepower compared to all other HACs and to keep it in balance, it lacks in tank. Thats the concept. Thats Gayllente. The concept of Gal...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.30 02:39:00
|
5. CONCORD stealth boost? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Hello, apparently the reaction time for CONCORD - when a spawn is already present - has been decreased. It used to be around four seconds, now it is just two seconds. Is this a hidden feature of the latest patch?
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.29 04:47:00
|
6. Tech 3: Strategic Cruiser Bonuses - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon there is a BIG different between minmatar getting 7.5% rof per level and 10% falloff bonus per level. and gallente getting 7.5% rof per level , 10% falloff bonus per level , and 7.5% damage per level. If you ...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.09 12:46:00
|
7. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: MotherMoon well, wouldn't a MWD bonus be good for ECM drones or web drones? not a big different in combat, but a decent one I would think. Web drones are utterly useless since they have very low HP, and even when using ...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.09 09:32:00
|
8. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Edited by: Xonja 2zero on 09/03/2009 08:56:21 Originally by: IceAero With respect to the new T3 changes, the Legion and the Proteus are too similar! Solution: The Amarr electronic subsystems need to give 1 less mid slot, and 1 more l...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.09 08:55:00
|
9. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: CCP Nozh Proteus: Might remove one hardpoint of the drone focused offensive system The Proteus is now almost usable. It is basically back to where it was before you blanket-nerfed cpu/grid on all STRATCs, plus a ut...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.03.04 23:06:00
|
10. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Apparently CPU output from Electronics I got quite a nerf as well. My 4-6-7 ranged Proteus attempt that is entirely faction/deadspace setup no longer fits. Dronebay is now 150 instead of 175. Yeah, i'll pass on that.
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.02.28 12:12:00
|
11. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
On workable combinations for the Proteus: Originally by: CCP Nozh I'm falling in love with Proteus 13131 (fitting screen top to bottom). That's the only halfway good combination right now. Except that Propulsion I (and III) are use...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.02.28 09:06:00
|
12. Tech 3 Ship - Feedback Thread - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
The Proteus can now be set up as a drone boat with 175m¦ bay and 100mbit bandwidth. That's a step in the right direction, but it needs more to stand up to the other T3 ships in my opinion. No other ship type lacks standoff capability as much as G...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2009.02.25 23:04:00
|
13. So long, New Eden (not nano related) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
You built EVE on the financial shoulders of long-time players. EVE is still Everyone VS Everyone, but it still is not for everyone . And never will be, as it is still way too complex for the average "casual" gamer. Even continually watering down ...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.08.05 20:08:00
|
14. So long, New Eden (not nano related) - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Thank You CCP, for two years of playing a great game. Thanks also for making it easy for me to leave. Yes, I'm quitting. No, this is not about the nano-nerf. In fact, i find it amusing that it took You so long to react to the issue, and come up wi...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.08.05 20:07:00
|
15. Another Nerf Falcon Thread? Discuss please.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Malcanis You're either stupid or deliberately lying. Works against everything? Riiiiight. Apart from: Drones - out of drone control/autoaggro range at jamming optimal FoFs - missiles give plenty forewarning, can war...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.05.28 22:23:00
|
16. Another Nerf Falcon Thread? Discuss please.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: scepternine So Molotov, you want to remove ECM, remove NANO, I bet you want to remove number advantage too, and have clean fights where the only thing that really matters is numbers of people and skill. Fair PvP with muskets...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.05.28 17:52:00
|
17. Another Nerf Falcon Thread? Discuss please.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Originally by: Merin Ryskin You realize that the Arazu has this nice little thing called a cloaking device , right? Fly cloaked to within damp range, then remove the Falcon. Seriously people, think before you whine. A) Most likely, the ...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.05.28 09:52:00
|
18. Another Nerf Falcon Thread? Discuss please.... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Let's step outside of the discussion whether having one or two Falcons in your gangs is worth crying nerf, and see how it scales up. Fast forward half a year. Nanofitting everything has become obsolete because of changes in stacking penalties and...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.05.28 08:55:00
|
19. CCP Hammerhead: Specialization, Racial Strong Points - Quo Vadis? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong what about all the people who don't want to play in the style that the overpowered ships provide? What about the people that don't want to play with a Caldari Achura face? I hereby demand that all Caldari Achu...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.03.17 08:21:00
|
20. CCP Hammerhead: Specialization, Racial Strong Points - Quo Vadis? - in Test Server Feedback [original thread]
Originally by: Goumindong Originally by: Xonja 2zero Oh hi, it's you again. I know you love to nitpick on single points of an argument in order to discredit the whole post. We've met when i argumented for the Eos. I am sure you...
- by Xonja 2zero - at 2008.03.15 18:55:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |